Coder preparations
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
|
||||
from typing import Literal
|
||||
|
||||
from pydantic import Field, model_validator
|
||||
|
||||
from contracts.base import _StrictModel
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class LanguageSnapshot(_StrictModel):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
The language the plan commits to, plus the toolchain it will use.
|
||||
Chosen by Plan from the target files; consumed by Act and Verify.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
name: str = Field(
|
||||
min_length=1,
|
||||
description="Language name, e.g. 'python', 'typescript', 'go'.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
version: str | None = Field(
|
||||
description="Language version if known, else null.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
test_runner: str = Field(
|
||||
min_length=1,
|
||||
description="How tests are run, e.g. 'pytest', 'vitest', 'go test'.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
formatter: str | None = Field(
|
||||
description="Formatter command, or null if none.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
linter: str | None = Field(
|
||||
description="Linter command, or null if none.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
detected_from: list[str] = Field(
|
||||
description="Marker files used to detect, e.g. ['pyproject.toml'].",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class PlanStep(_StrictModel):
|
||||
order: int = Field(ge=1, description="1-based ordering of this step.")
|
||||
file: str = Field(
|
||||
min_length=1,
|
||||
description="Repo-relative path (no leading '/', no '..').",
|
||||
)
|
||||
change_kind: Literal["create", "modify", "delete"]
|
||||
description: str = Field(
|
||||
min_length=1,
|
||||
description="What changes in this file and why, 1–3 sentences.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class PlanOutput(_StrictModel):
|
||||
summary: str = Field(
|
||||
min_length=1, description="1–3 sentence summary of the whole change."
|
||||
)
|
||||
steps: list[PlanStep] = Field(
|
||||
min_length=1, description="Ordered steps. Each step is one file."
|
||||
)
|
||||
target_files: list[str] = Field(
|
||||
min_length=1, description="Unique repo-relative files this plan touches."
|
||||
)
|
||||
target_tests: list[str] = Field(
|
||||
description="Tests that must pass. May be empty for non-code changes."
|
||||
)
|
||||
language: LanguageSnapshot
|
||||
breaks_existing: bool = Field(
|
||||
description="True if this changes existing behavior a user or caller "
|
||||
"could rely on.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
risk_notes: list[str] = Field(
|
||||
description="Reasons this might be risky. Non-empty if breaks_existing.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@model_validator(mode="after")
|
||||
def _consistency(self) -> "PlanOutput":
|
||||
# 1. target_files must equal the set of files in steps.
|
||||
step_files = {s.file for s in self.steps}
|
||||
if set(self.target_files) != step_files:
|
||||
raise ValueError(
|
||||
f"target_files {sorted(self.target_files)} must equal "
|
||||
f"the set of step files {sorted(step_files)}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# 2. breaks_existing implies risk_notes non-empty.
|
||||
if self.breaks_existing and not self.risk_notes:
|
||||
raise ValueError("breaks_existing=True requires at least one risk note")
|
||||
|
||||
# 3. No absolute paths, no traversal.
|
||||
for f in self.target_files:
|
||||
if f.startswith("/") or ".." in f.split("/"):
|
||||
raise ValueError(f"unsafe path: {f!r}")
|
||||
|
||||
return self
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user